FOUL PLAY OR FOUL WATER?
The Letby Case through the sewers an beyond
4th December 2024
The mystery surrounding the Lucy Letby convictions is not going away. It is widening and deepening as more is being revealed. There is much about this miscarriage of justice which almost appears engineered.
Take the farcical reporting by the approved media on the case. I have listened to those who argue that Lucy is guilty time and time again, and all of them claim that the only reason there are doubters as to Lucy’s guilt is because those individuals weren’t there in court to hear all the evidence which apparently proves definitively that Lucy is female psycho serial killer of the century. So I keep listening, waiting patiently for them to come up with even just one little piece of that claimed evidence. I have strained my ears and eyes for that smoking gun that is going to be drawn out of the holster mid article or mid video. I have waited in vain. It turns out, there is no smoke no gun no shooter, no one home.
Let’s take the Daily Mail podcast on the Letby case as an example. This is hosted by Liz Hull and Caroline Cheetham who get terribly excited when they get a chance to roll out members of the public who absolutely know Lucy is guilty. These inteviewees on their podcast enlighten us as to how they know Lucy is guilty. One reason is that they heard Lucy say in court that she was arrested in her pyjamas when shockingly, they saw on TV the truth was, she had a track suit on. Well that settles it then. Bloody actress. Doris Day was highly suspect too
Then these people get all excited saying Lucy lied by claiming she did not know what ‘go commando ‘ meant. Well neither did I, shock horror, I had to google it. That proves I’m a serial killer coz I am just not keeping up with these language fads. Then they get all worked up about the fact Lucy didn’t cry in court at the places they wanted her to cry at, ie at the mention of some of the babies, but they claim she did cry when the mysterious Dr. U turned up in court. This they claim makes her an obvious baby murderer . Problem is, it doesn’t. It makes her look pretty normal as normal goes. That is because human beings are naturally self-interested. They look after their own. They have to, to ensure survival of their offspring . The babies that died were not Lucy’s offspring. At the time she worked with them roughly 8 years ago, she probably will have had some emotions regarding them because they were at times her (shared) responsibility. She will possibly have suffered a certain amount of grief at their deaths (and we know she sent condolence cards to parents of these babies – which shows she most likely was feeling some grief herself as well as empathy for the loss of those parents). But grief is not static. It is a process. Obviously for a parent who loses a child that grief process is likely to take a huge amount of years to process, and some may never fully process it, but any grief Lucy felt will have been quickly worked through probably within a week or so, if that. Medical professionals cannot afford to cry over every death otherwise they would not be able to do their job properly, because a large part of their role in a hospital is dealing with death. It would be like visiting your local breakers yard 7 years after they scrapped Minny the Metro and expecting the guys to shed a tear for her. Fact check. They ain’t even gonna remember her. Their heart is with that triumph Bonneville they’re nursing back at home.
To expect Lucy 7 or 8 years down the line to be grieving and emotional about babies that she is not even related to, is stupidly ridiculous. Why would she? Instead she showed emotion in exactly the place any regular human being would feel it. When the issue related to her own personal life. When the registrar she had been close to was giving evidence against her. That would be traumatic. Any tears over the babies though, at this stage would be mere crocodile tears. And of course if she wept crocodile tears that would be more pickings for the vultures. For all we know her lawyer may have advised her anyway, to remain as calm as is humanly possible.
Another thing these Lucy haters drone on about is how Lucy tied herself in circles when being questioned on the murder by insulin issue by admitting that insulin must have been injected into one or two of the babies. They claim that is an admission of guilt. But how so? She never said she herself injected insulin. She just accepted the prosecution claim that insulin was used in this way because guess what, she is a young nurse, not a scientist or biochemist. How could she know that the prosecution was talking a load of bull and that there are other explanations for how the c-peptide levels were so low. How could she know the expert the prosecution rolled out might be wrong? Agreeing that a murder may have occurred does not make you a murderer and it is ludicrous to suggest it does.
The people who groan on about Lucy not acting stably or consistently on the stand are forgetting that she had already been locked up for getting on for two years on remand before her trial for the most horrendous crimes which she almost certainly did not commit. And that is a breach of the law anyway because two of the clauses of the Magna carta which still survive today are:
No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions.. … …………… except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land …
To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay right or justice
This is still on the statute books and today even applies to peasants and women. So all remanding of the accused in custody is unlawful but they have of course coded stuff in legislation to give them the supposed power to ignore this. The relevant Acts are the Bail Act 1976 and The Prosecution of Offences (Custody Time Limits) Regulations 1987. The maximum time limit they are supposed to hold someone for an indictable offence without trial is 182 days. Many people including Lucy Letby though are being held far longer on remand without good reason. As usual the establishment provide get out clauses so they can ignore both constitutional and common law and also their own parliament made legislation. The result is people are advised by lawyers to plead guilty to get out quicker even if they are innocent. I did this myself once, because I was concerned about my dog and wanted to get out. Albeit over a relatively minor offence - but that offence which I did not commit is still on my record.
Much of the time Lucy was held before trial , given what she was accused of, may have meant she had to be in solitary. I would like to challenge any of those people who accuse her of being odd, weird, or unstable to be locked up in those circumstances and stay 2.4 volvo and a kid whilst riding a bike and nodding in all the right places. If not in solitary, her company would include many disturbed women. I know coz I have been locked up in those places myself. Being surrounded by acute distress cannot fail to rub off on even the sanest person. And it is pretty well known anyway that solitary confinement is a sure road to insanity and no one is immune from that. Christ knows the state Robert Maudsley is in now – kept in a box underground for …. years. He has done some pretty bad shit but how he ended up in prison in the first place is a very sad story and it could easily happen to anyone who has been abused. Robert Maudsley solitary confinement
None of the above mentioned irrelevant nonsense aired in the Daily Mail podcast and other MSM proves Letby’s guilt. Her emotion or lack of it, her comments about pyjamas or ‘go commando’, or her lack of knowledge of complicated science. Nor do the post-it notes. Lucy is clearly a scapegoat. I don’t know whether she was playing this role in her own family, it doesn’t appear that way, but I know I was. I was in the scapegoat role all through my childhood and into adulthood and on numerous occasions I would own up to things I had never done. I would take the blame for things that other kids had done. And I did it consistently. It went as far as me saying that I had killed my brother. But this is nothing unusual. This is what scapegoats do. They start off being blamed by others and eventually blame themselves regardless of whether they are guilty or not.
Having been made a scapegoat it is not difficult to see how Lucy started ‘confessing’. It is not unusual when being accused of something you have not done, to start to believe that maybe you are crazy and you just did it, not knowing what you were doing, or you start to question whether you might have blanks in you memory . Lucy was under so much stress, it would be hardly surprising if she started to question her own sanity. It may have crossed her mind that she had unwittingly murdered babies whilst in some kind of fugue state or dissociative trance. I am not sure whether her barrister , Ben Myers, tried to keep those post it notes from being admissible in court, but he didn’t cite the issue in the appeal application and I would like to know why. Those notes being presented to the jury as some kind of confession is a violation of PACE rules, because they were a result of some counselling she was undergoing. Once seen they could not be unseen.
It is hard not to look at those notes without thinking maybe she did it . Maybe she is guilty. But context is everything. This was a woman who by that time must have been terrified and likely quite disorientated. The notes mean nothing in regards to how those babies died. Many people who have been through hell believe they themselves are evil or the devil incarnate. They will confess to all kinds of horrendous crimes they have not done. They will certainly think they are unworthy and better off dead. I can think of several people I knew like that. It is proof of fuck all.
After looking at more of what is coming out of Thirwall enquiry, I am not surprised that Dame Thirwall was keen to stop the general public watching the hearings on TV or online. But why was Thirwall, particularly, picked for this job? And why so quickly?She does have a track record of chairing inquiries. One of those was the Airedale Inquiry which was a private inquiry (seems like Thirwall likes the behind closed doors approach.) This looked into the deaths of three elderly people at Airedale Foundation Trust.. That inquiry involved the case of Ann Grigg- Booth, another nurse who was accused of murder and who was at the centre of a prescribing scandal. She committed suicide in 2005 whilst awaiting trial. The inquiry found that it was ‘unlikely that she deliberately set out to harm patients’. All the evidence seemed to suggest she was an experienced, caring and competent nurse. ,
So the witch hunters appear to have driven Ann Grigg-Booth to her death.
The main reason Kathryn Thirwall was picked as poster person for the inquiry is that she is fully on board with the agenda. It turns out she became the senior presiding Judge for England and Wales from December 2019 and was thus given significant responsibility for the response of the judiciary to ‘covid’. There were in fact several strategic appointments around that time because the end of 2019 was a historic time for our cult overlords. It was just before the beginning of 2020. And the ten years spanning 2020 – 2030 is the period that has been long planned for (U.N. Agenda 21-30 for so-called ‘sustainable development’). Countries worldwide have been groomed for this for many years. Just as the historic period was set to kick off with a psychological experiment in the form of a fake pandemic, Dame Thirwall was given responsibility for the response of the judiciary to this supposed ‘pandemic’. IN other words she was given responsibility for the judicial solution part of the ‘problem, reaction, solution’ scenario, further removing public access to justice.
I don’t think I have to explain how the courts and tribunals deteriorated during the ‘covid’ years and how there was a big shift towards remote hearings, allowing judges to avoid looking people in the eye when they screw them and more importantly fast track corporate claims against individuals whilst not having to bother with any troubling plebs standing up to defend themselves.
Thirwall of course would not have been put in such a strategic position for Agenda 21-30 unless she could be utterly relied upon to toe the party line and prostrate herself in front of her globalist masters.. So we can be sure she will keep that Overton window firmly framed in the Letby inquiry. The question that interests me is this one:
Is the whole Letby saga also a ‘problem, reaction, solution’ game?
I have touched on this here before
There were secretive briefings of the media by the CPS , with prosecution present but not the defence. That is suspicious and not in line with open justice. There does seem to be a much wider and more sinister thing emerging here which is not just about Lucy herself and her wrongful conviction.
One of the things that will not be leaking out from Liverpool Town Hall in any meaningful way is foul water. Luckily though it is leaking into other places and one of those is a podcast called ‘Was there ever a crime?’ by John Sweeney , ex investigative journalist for the Observer, Panorama and BBC whistleblower. He outlines reports done at the hospital in 2015/16. One of these was on sewage coming up through the sink regularly in Nursery One intensive care unit and in the maternity unit as well as the rest of the hospital. The plumbers logged reports about the regular sewage leaks during the period. Sweeney has obtained a High Risk Report first logged on the 20/05/2015 and produced by the hospital maintenance dept. and it points to a major health problem at COCH neonatal unit in early 2015. It talks of a tap in Nursery 1 being replaced and having grown pseudomonas. Tap in Nursery 3 also tested positive for pseudomonas but the report states the tap would not be replaced due to ‘capacity. So COCH knowingly left the tap in nursery 3 dangerously infected to save money.
The jurors never heard this report but they absolutely should have done because it was just before Letby was supposed to have started her ‘killing spree’. Sian Evans who gave birth to Jacob at the unit on 6th June 2015, has explained how her son got sepsis at 8 days old. He was transferred to another hospital, recovered and then was sent back to COCH and developed sepsis again . Lucy’s first supposed victim, Baby A , died on 8th June. Baby C died on same day Jacob was diagnosed with sepsis. Baby D died on 22nd June. All their medical notes indicated possible sepsis. Baby A’s notes showed he was being given meds for sepsis. Baby C notes had ‘suspected sepsis’ written by hand on them. Baby D’s post mortem had pneumonia down as cause of death which can be linked with sepsis.
Remember the narrative. All the deaths and collapses claimed as ‘unexpected’. The Tales of the Unexpected. Well its not credible. This risk was known about.
John Sweeney has approached the police for comment, but of course they have come back with the excuse that no comment can be made while the Inquiry and police investigations are going on. COCH say the same thing, naturally, as did Liverpool Women’s Hospital in their response to my FOI. It is the text book method of the establishment to excuse themselves from scrutiny, which is why these ‘inquiries/investigations drag on indefinitely. They provide a useful cover. And time for the little boy’s club to work out more fairy tales.
Incidentally COCH was found to be the fifth worst hospital in the country for timely treatment of sepsis. Sepsis has actually been on the rise in Western Europe over a number of years. I found this out when I did some FOIs on sepsis during the time the BBC was desperately trying to panic everyone with claimed covid fatalities because I was wondering how many ‘covid’ deaths were in truth sepsis deaths which they needed to cover up.
According to Sweeney an investigation has showed that only 33 percent of those babies at COCH who needed antibiotics for sepsis were given those antibiotics.
It’s that thirty three number again and it is popping up quite a bit in the Letby case. Lucy (whose name means light) was convicted aged 33. She apparently according to the first trial murdered 7 babies and tried to kill 6 others = 13 crimes (the number of the ring of light – the zodiac – ie the 13 signs, if you include Ophiuchus). At Liverpool women’s hospital the BBC claim that potential life threatening incidents occurred on a third of Lucy’s 33 shifts which occurred in 2012 and 2015. 2012 + 2015 = 13. One third of 33 shifts = 11 shifts. 11 is the path into manifestation (the Fool card) and it signifies the INNOCENCE of youth. The 11th letter of the Greek alphabet is Lambda. This is the wavelength symbol. This letter derives from the phoenician ‘Lamed’ and is linked with the deity, authority, and justice/scales/libra and 11 just so happens to be the key Justice in the tarot. Both the Greek and Hebrew version of this letter carry a value of 30 which again is important Biblical number being the age Jesus is beginning his ministry symbolic of the 30 degrees which spans each sign in the zodiac wheel.
Lambda
To understand the importance of these numbers please see my previous articles -green-eggs-and-ham or London - City of the Moon Goddess . On 40 percent of her shifts ( Jesus forty days and forty nights in the wilderness/Venus in retrograde) endotracheal tubes were apparently dislodged. Lucy was originally charged with 22 counts of murdering and harming babies. 22 = 2/3 of 33. Two thirds of course is 0.666 recurring. These are important numbers in sacred geometry and numerology therefore to the masonic circles. 22 is twice 11 and the 22nd path of the Qabala is linked with Lamed, Justice card and Libra. It is a severe form of justice and legal retribution associated with Mars/war and Saturn. This is Tipareth /Geburah path in the Qabala. So it is harsh justice where the sun/god/king is punishing but it is at the same time the path from a punishing break down to the light.
If you are not into sacred numbers please don’t dismiss this too easily. The global powers behind the scenes really are following astrology, as the Nazi party did before an during WWII.. Remember Jack the Ripper. Those murders are pretty much proven now to have been masonic ritual murders. I do not think any of the masons were involved in the COCH baby deaths as these were natural deaths anyway, not murders, but the scapegoating of Lucy looks to me like a masonic ritual.
It has now been admitted in the Thirwall Inquiry that there is Masonic interference in COCH. It was Brearey who initially brought this up. But of course they have inverted how we interpret this. We are supposed to believe that the masonic involvement was working against Brearey, and hence helpful for Lucy, but this is inversion no doubt. But at least they have admitted masonic interference, they are just lying about what form that interference is really taking.
Lucy’s birthday makes her either Capricorn (in western astrology) or Saggie in Vedic astrology (as just outlined in my recent Paddington article, Paddington in Peru this is the same as Paddington’s winter birthdays). Note the hummingbird in the top left corner of the new Paddington ambassador mural on south bank. Capricorn is the scapegoat. I am convinced that the masons who are engineering this BS are deliberately putting out these numbers. I think Lucy was picked deliberately as the sacrificial scapegoat and the name of Operation Hummingbird was picked as it was the name used for the Night of Long Knives by Hitler (purge of the brownshirts). Operation Hummingbird None of this is accident and I know that those of you reading this who are awake to the agenda will understand that this is exactly the sort of game the elites play. They think it is amusing.
I am not ruling out that this whole case is also a deliberate distraction. Remember Nicola Bully . Well this is Nicola Bully with the volume turned up.
Despite the hissy fits of Brearey and Jayaram, it does seem, having looked at some of the emails and correspondence released by Thirwall, that the COCH management did a thorough investigation of the matters concerned including liaising with the coroner (who had a statutory right to refer the deaths to the police if he thought necessary). They were taking legal advice and following it.
The minutes of a board Meeting held on 13th April 2017 showed that quite an extensive pathology review had taken place which had delayed things but the coroner had not flagged up anything suspicious.
I see no reason why management should have run to the police on the basis of the emotional outbursts of the accusers. Corinne Slingo, a lawyer from whom they were receiving advice suggested in an email on 4th April 2017 that the motivation of the main consultant behind accusations against Lucy may spring from the
‘personal accountability and involvement of the consultant in the care of the neonates on the unit, and the absence of any clear explanation for 5 of the deaths in particular, which I understand remain unexplained despite review’
Dee Appleton Cairns, Deputy Director of Human Resources, phoned lawyer Ian Pace on 5th July 2016, who took notes of that call. In those notes it states that Dee mentions that the midwives said that the triplets had shared a placenta and deaths were due to congenital issues. However the staff were all turning on each other and pointing the finger. A consultant had referred to a midwife as ‘Beverley Allit’. Dee was satisfied that no malicious issues were involved in the baby deaths and collapses.
Ian Pace advised Dee that there was potential risk that the nurse who was being accused (ie Letby) could bring a claim for constructive unfair dismissal if she decided to resign. To defend itself against that position the trust should put in place steps to justify a satisfied position that there is a suggestion or evidence that there is a link between any dismissal and the suspicions about Lucy due to the commonality of her presence at relevant incidents. The Trust might therefore have a defence that there had been sufficient evidence to put the allegations against her including if the trust decided to suspend her
This advice from the lawyer could have led the management to lean towards emphasising Lucy’s possible culpability in order to protect themselves from any future claim by Lucy. It is effectively encouraging them to make it look like she could be a serial killer in order to protect COCH from financial loss. This also may be why management morphed from a position of solidly backing Lucy to luke warm indifference and a backing down in the face of the police, courts and inquiry.
Jane Hawdon was commissioned by management to do a report some time after this in 2016 and after the RCPCH report, looking into possible causes for the baby deaths and collapses. In her own evidence to the inquiry she states that when she was provided with the notes for the babies she was given incomplete records and they were in disarray and out of order making it hard for her to do any proper analysis. She stated that this is a very unusual state for notes to be in. This hampered her ability to do a thorough report. No explanation has been given for the missing notes and the poor quality of paperwork provided to Jane Hawdon. I think the the inquiry wants us to surmise that this might somehow be the fault of Letby because they keep hinting that she altered notes . However I have not seen any evidence of this. Far more likely is that there was evidence in the notes of the real suspected cause of baby collapses and deaths, and this was omitted. Firstly because of the known tap with pseudomonas and decision not to replace it and secondly because the hospital, bearing in mind the legal advice , might need to make Lucy look potentially guilty to protect themselves from a possible unfair dismissal claim. A factor also could be the fact that doctors were routinely not completing notes properly, as has already been exposed at the inquiry.
The results of the Hawdon report was that of 17 babies she was reviewing, she concluded that only babies A I O and P were unexplained and unexpected and could benefit from a forensic investigation. Had she had all the correct notes, maybe she would have also been able to find that babies A I O and P had explainable causes too, without needing a murderer.
In any case she did not find any suspicious act by Lucy Letby or any other nurse.
Brearey was the main driver behind blaming Lucy and we have to wonder why , given the state of the ward and the sewage. He must have known that babies would be at risk even if every nurse on the unit had been Mother Theresa. When we are first told he saw a connection with Lucy being present at a prescribed number of deaths and collapses his response was.
Lucy? Oh no, not nice Lucy.
… not nice Lucy. That’s the Lucy that we are all supposed to believe had no feelings and was weird and loved death.
Why did he say that? Sounds a bit creepy. He was asked in the inquiry why he said that but has given no convincing explanation. There was a rumour that a consultant was harassing Lucy. Maybe it was him, although Lucy apparently denied he had propositioned her. If he had the hots for Lucy he may have (perhaps subconsciously) wanted her out of the way because he could not handle his feelings for her. His use of the term ‘drawer of doom’ suggests that there was something very personal in his demonisation of Lucy. I would have expected a professional to refer to any evidence they had collected as ‘incriminating evidence’ or ‘important notes’ or the like. ‘Drawer of Doom’ sounds more like what a kid would refer to in Grand Theft Auto or some other computer game. Or it sounds like how you would refer to information that was damaging to your soul. If he had fallen for Lucy, she could have seemed to harbour doom , or even become demonic to him.
Brearey and Jayaram have even gone so far as describing themselves as ‘battered wives’ ! Poor little victims. That is odd for consultants. Most consultants I have come across are at the very least big-headed and some have a god complex. They tend to be over-represented amongst narcissists and psycopaths. I am not gonna attempt to diagnose these two but when challenged by people not agreeing with him, Jayaram seems to have collapses into helpless victim mode. Listening to him describe how he was treated by management and Lucy is far more telling of his state of mind than anyone else’. In the meeting when Jayaram was told Letby was going to be coming back to work alongside him, he describes the meeting as ‘choreographed’ and says Karen Rees was ‘cocking her nose at him’ and had a triumphant tone she and Alison Kelly had a look on their faces like ‘we’ve got you now’. If he is experiencing faces or motives in a warped way and has become paranoid, then that could explain his demonisation of Lucy. He comes across to me as someone who is absolutely unable to take criticism and hence disintegrates, albeit temporarily, when he has no choice but to do so. At the end of his Thirwall interview you tube he pours out his apparent concern for the parents and claims that those of us questioning the narrative are just noise and are insensitive. Well of course he feels that way because some of us question his integrity and for all he knows some of the parents might agree with us dissenters. We can’t know because we only have lawyers claiming to speak for them as they have been gagged.
Regardless miscarriages of justice happen more frequently than people realise and the only way they come to light is because people question verdicts if they appear to be unsafe and it is often public pressure which influences judicial decisions especially in high profile cases. That is why we are gonna keep turning up the volume till they listen. Being locked up for life is no joke if you are not guilty.
‘Battered wives’ is not how other staff on the unit like Karen Rees and midwife Anne Marie Lawrence saw Jayaram and Brearey, apparently they came across more like bullies and had a basic lack of respect for others. I can’t help wondering if Jayaram and Brearey are battered wives , then what the hell does that make Lucy? Burnt offering?
When Jayaram is not a battered wife, he is a budding TV personality and TV doctor and Sweeney reckons he is also a singer in a band called ‘Deluded’ . In 2015, when babies on his watch were apparently being culled by a psycho witch, he was starring in Series 1 of Born Naughty for Channel four with GP Dawn Harper who has her title linked with a skewed Petrine (upside down) cross on her website.
. Nice matching scarf and dress
More on this here crisis actors and controlled ops.
With all his TV work outside COCH, you couldn’t expect Jayaram to expect the babies he was responsible for to collapse or die. What I mean is that it would be unexpected if he expected anything. His mind was very likely elsewhere dreaming of that day when he would wake up to stardom in the hall of fame alongside, Mick Jagger, Elvis Presley or Al Puccino.
Here in true hero style is Jayaram on his covid TV doctor duties . pushing the covid gene therapy to the general public
And here he is telling you how he would have contact traced and locked you all down more like the true little authoritarian control freak he is https://www.cheshire-live.co.uk/news/chester-cheshire-news/chester-consultant-believes-more-coronavirus-18109042
And if you’re on the edge of your seat waiting for the next instalment of hero Ravi, a little bird says he is working on a film about Lucy Letby in conjunction with a well known series producer. He has grown a beard now which makes me wonder if he is trying to hide a bit from public view now and whether he may no longer be working as as consultant paediatrican..
Finally the police are now questioning Lucy again about more baby deaths. This is highly suspect given the timing, as there is no useful purpose in dragging up other deaths and reframing them as murders so they can be attributed to Lucy. She already has several life sentences and has no chance of getting out unless there is a retrial. . The police investigations therefore probably serve two purposes. Firstly because while they are happening the institutions involved can crawl out of responding to FOIs and being transparent, and secondly because another trial will restrict reporting on the case and have the affect of silencing dissenters for as long as the trial lasts. I noticed on statistician Richard Gill’s wordpress site , he documents how he has had threatening communications from Cheshire constabulary regarding supposed contempt of court, Richard Gill blog but his statistical analysis has been vital to expose not just the Letby case, but other miscarriages of justice. The authorities have also tried to smear and shut down Sarritta ADams of Science on Trial and Peter Elston of Chimp Investor, both who have done much to expose the flaws in the Letby case.
I can smell plenty of foul water and plenty of foul play, only not by Lucy.
Incredible detail and an extremely well put case.
oh , what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive!