OPERATION HUMMINGBIRD
Is this the Biggest Miscarriage of Justice in Britain in living memory?
2nd September 2023
OPERATION HUMMINGBIRD
Is this the Biggest Miscarriage of Justice in Britain in living memory?
Lucy Letby has just been convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six others at the Countess of Chester hospital after a police operation dubbed ‘Operation Hummingbird’ and a ten month trial which began in October 2022. The co-opting of ‘hummingbird’ by Chester police won’t be accidental. Hitler used the same term for his ‘Night of the Long Knives’, the purge of the Brownshirts. A kind of sacrifice of your own for the mythical future ‘greater good’. In plain English that means the interests of the ‘great and good’ and we all know who they are.
Hummingbirds are tiny birds and the bee hummingbird is the smallest bird in existence today. They are the only birds known to have the ability to fly backwards and upside down and their tails can make a whistling sound while the excessively fast flapping of their wings causes the hum. Their wings rotate forwards and backwards in a figure 8 pattern, similar to the pattern the sun makes over a year called the ‘analemma’, the symbol of infinity.
And 8 is the number which is always used to symbolise chaos in the form of arrows.
The hummingbird is of prime importance to native Americans and a huge hummingbird figure forms part of the mysterious Nazca lines at the foot of the Andes.
Many ancient and current civilisations or tribes have hummingbird myths. The Hopi have an ancestral spirit hummingbird and myths involving these tiny birds form an important part of central/south American native culture and they are caught up in Aztec, Mayan, Inca, Cherokee and other tribal belief systems. The feathers of the hummingbird are believed to have magical powers. In the Northwest of America there are Hummingbird clans. They can be associated with many positive qualities such as joy, luck, being present in time, and they are also seen as messengers to the other world. They can signify godlike perfection. There are some beautiful creation myths - the Mayans believed the sun turned into a hummingbird to pursue the beautiful woman the moon. Another indigenous story revolves around a couple who were forbidden lovers from a tribe. They escape judgement by becoming a hummingbird and a red flower, so able to openly love each other forever. The Chinese myth of the Elephant and the Hummingbird, involving the impending collapse of the sky, is a moral tale of collectivism and globalists have co-opted this symbol, no doubt any ‘operation hummingbirds’ are signs of the new world order that they want us believe will be all sweet candy, colours and delights.
Hummingbirds can also symbolise fire and the Aztec God Huitzilopochtli, a creature who was half man, half hummingbird, represented the sun, war and human sacrifice.
He almost looks a bit Qabalistic Hebrew Aleph:
I think this God of war and human sacrifice is key to the choice of name of the Letby police operation. The cabal have been throwing a huge amount of ancient American indian, particularly Aztec symbolism at us as they promote chaos and attempt to destroy civilization as we know it and return to these ancient belief systems. This back to nature approach can sound attractive until you realise it will be the likes of Klaus Schwab who will be living the dream whilst the rest of us (those who survive) will only be permitted to view life remotely through our digital prison.
When the media first announced Operation Hummingbird and the story that nurse, Lucy Letby had been charged with such horrendous crimes something struck me as not being quite right about this case, so I followed it closely. My own long experience of how the NHS closes ranks and is willing to lie and produce false records in order to perpetuate the narrative it wishes to portray, especially when the top brass believes there might be a looming, costly negligence claim, made me question the narrative around Lucy. After looking into the actual case put forward by the prosecution and discovering how little evidence there was against Letby, and even that flimsy and circumstantial, I felt the jury would be certain to find her innocent.
The whole crux of the case rested on the fact that the prosecution produced a chart which claimed that Lucy Letby was the only nurse on duty at every collapse or death involving 17 babies during a period which stretched from June 2015 to June 2016. The problem with that is that the police were actually examining 33 suspicious incidents, (yes 33, that masonic number cropping up again) made up of 17 deaths and 16 collapses covering that time period and 8 of the deaths were at a time when Letby was not present. But the prosecution cherry-picked 17 particular incidents of deaths/collapses to show to the jury whilst completely ignoring other deaths and incidents that happened during that same period. Had they included those other deaths, Lucy would not have been present at all incidents but other nurses /medical staff might have been present in enough incidences to create concern.
I can’t help noticing the numbers. 17 equals 8 in numerological terms. Lots of ‘chaosy’ stuff.
As Norman Fenton and Dr. Scott McLachan have pointed out, different charts could have been produced picking another cluster of events for which other members of staff could have been shown to be present and Lucy not present. Charts for consultants present when incidents occurred should and could also have been produced. Lucy did night shifts yet not all the deaths or collapses were necessarily instigated in the actual hours she was on shift. And she generally did more overtime as she lived close by and would in any case appear to be on more shifts than other nurses. For some reason, the defence did not present alternative charts to the jury which would show alternative scenarios for staff presence on the unit during suspicious incidents, perhaps because Ben Myers hands were tied in this regard. But the Jury were certainly not given the full picture on which to base their decision.
What the MSM is keeping well hidden is that at the time of all these babies deaths, they were considered to be from natural causes. When Lucy Letby was arrested in 2018, two to three years after the deaths and collapses, no murder of any baby had been established. So the police were presented with a potential murderer who powerful NHS consultants wanted dealt with, and they therefore needed to quickly find murders for the alleged murderer to have committed. That is when they sought an expert to arrange this minor detail. It is important to note that the neonatal unit had , around the time of the spike in deaths and collapses of babies, been upgraded to a category 2 LNU which meant it had an influx of very sick/premature babies to care for. It is also significant that Letby had complained about errors by medics including consultants. Two of the so-called ‘hero’ consultants TV doctor Ravi Jayaraam, (who you can find a nice picture of online celebrating with that other pillar of moral rectitude Matty Hancock) and Dr. Stephen Brearey managed to convince themselves the spike in deaths back in 2015/16 must have all been an evil plot by this murderous whistle-blowing ‘witch’ called Lucy Letby. This nurse who had inconveniently pointed out the errors of staff above her pay grade, must, they claimed, without any motive had decided to become the worst female serial killer in the history of Britain. About halfway through 2017, Brearey and Jayaram reported their theory to the police. The only problem was that the coroner had not identified any murders. That is where a retired paediatrician, Welsh nationalist and political activist Dr, Dewi Evans came in useful. This so called ‘independent expert’ had set up a private company offering his services as a ‘professional expert witness’ . He also happens to have stood for election as Chair of Plaid Cymru, although he failed in that bid. Perhaps he needs money to fund his political ambitions as he touted for paid work on this case by contacting Cheshire police, and was willing to claim (for a fee) that murders had occurred back in 2015/16. It is unclear how this man (who turns out to have limited experience in neonatology, long out of date) was apparently deemed able to play pathologist and coroner all rolled into one and several years after the deaths of the babies in question and at a time when it was too late to carry out autopsies. The defence barrister Ben Myers, tried to get this so called ‘independent’ expert’s evidence dismissed. He cited a previous case involving a care order in which Court of Appeal Judge Lord Justice Jackson called Dr. Evans report in that case ‘worthless’ ‘and suggested he was not impartial. But it seems the judge in the Letby case did not want to see this glaring problem.
There is in fact a huge amount of evidence to suggest these deaths and collapses were the result of negligence. At the time when the spike in deaths and collapses were occurring a Dr. Gibbs was responsible as the on call consultant who the junior doctors often had to turn to for advice. But he was in the process of retiring and junior and trainee doctors seemed to be unsupervised much of the time. Mistakes were being made and Letby had been documenting medical errors on the Datix system. There are times when far too many failed attempts were made by junior or trainee doctors to insert an umbilical venus catheter which goes directly to the heart of a baby before they summonsed help. But the guidance on these type of procedures is clear. After three attempts, advice from a more experienced consultant should be sought before continuing. This shows inexperience or negligence on behalf of those medical staff, rather than any fault of Lucy Letby. These kind of mistakes can introduce pathogens via the catheter and it was know at the time that the unit had a raw sewage leak. Plumbers were being called in every week to deal with blocked or burst waste pipes above the neonatal unit. This ran right above the cots and sewage had even come up through the floor. Similar problems on other wards (even a brand new ward) has shown that these pathogens can transfer into the water supply and via nurses hands into baby feed. There is no need for the leak to occur on the particular ward, just anywhere in the hospital and this leak was right above the unit. A plumber was brought in by the defence in court to testify to this raw sewage problem in the Countess of Chester unit, yet the very likely possibility of pathogens such as entovirus was not considered by the court. But these kind of pathogens can cause air to collect in the abdomen which is what was happening to some of the babies that Letby was accused of deliberately pumping air into. Some of the babies were witnessed to have purple like spots on their bodies which could also have been related to pathogens from the raw sewage. Bacterial pathogens could also cause Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) and hence unexpected collapses. To take child P as an example, a baby that Letty was accused of pumping air into, Dr. Evans claimed that the excessive amount of air detected in the bowel could only be explained by that air being injected by Letby. This is a ridiculous claim since NEC is known to cause air in pockets in the bowel to show up on xrays. Yet NEC was not considered. The prosecution got away with dismissing all possible reasons for excessive air being found in some of the babies and simply relied on one biased explanation of the deaths and collapses convenient to their presumption of Letby's guilt.
Then we have the claims regarding two of the babies known as baby F and Baby L . These claims were that Letby had laced their feeding bags with insulin attempting to murder them. But manufactured insulin was not found in these babies, what was found was low c-peptide levels which can indicate that insulin has been administered. However other factors can cause this presentation in the blood. Addison's disease or liver problems were not considered. Maternal diabetes may have been a factor. But the only possibility that was considered was the deliberate administering of insulin. In short, the prosecution argument for all the deaths and collapses was simply that all other possibilities should be ignored. Murder should be assumed and Letby must be guilty because important people had pointed the finger in her direction.
Much has been made of a claim that deaths reduced once Letby was removed to administrative duties . However ONS data shows that in 2018/19 the rate of baby deaths at the Countess of Chester was even higher than in 2015/16. And in fact there were other factors which reduced the deaths and accidents because as Letby was removed from direct care of the babies, the ward was again downgraded so it was not taking such sick babies and extra staff were also brought in. Lots of media hype has surrounded paperwork found at Letby’s home, for example handover notes but as Dr. Scott McLachan has pointed out, nurses are encouraged to take these home in training sessions. Lucy made reflective journals and this is not unusual for a nurse. As for the note she left which has been plastered all over the media saying ‘I killed them’ this was written after she was being investigated and under enormous stress and pressure. It doesn’t take much knowledge of psychology to know that when people die unexpectedly those who are close to the deceased are very likely to blame themselves for the death. When my partner committed suicide I was saying ‘I murdered her’. It is a grief reaction. Lucy Letby was caring for the babies and would have felt responsible for some of those little ones that she had a lot of contact with. She is human despite the media attempts to paint her as otherwise. And despite the predictable plethora of so called psychologists and experts rolled out for us, claiming they know variously that she is either a narcissist, a psychopath or has some other kind of personality disorder. All this without having ever met her. In the Hague there was a similar case of a nurse, Lucia de Berk, who spent seven years in prison after being wrongly convicted of 7 murders on similar flimsy circumstantial evidence, also involving allegations of injecting insulin, and it was actually handover notes she had kept which helped her to appeal and secure her later release. So it is absolutely understandable why nurses might want to take notes home, also to refresh their memories should they get a call asking them for information when they are off duty.
In 2016 the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health produced a review report on the Neonatal services at the Countess of Chester Hospital. A link to it can be found here . RCPCH report. This was after the unit had been downgraded again from a Level 2 Local Neonatal Unit back to a Level 1 Special Care Unit in July 2016. Their investigation team included two highly experienced consultant paediatricians/neonatologists and a senior neonatal nurse with over 25 years experience, alongside another independent consultant and the head of the RCPCH. They found that both medical and nursing staffing levels had been insufficient for an LNU. It was noticed that there were more babies with lower birthweight on admission than usual. It was also noted that not all of the baby deaths had gone through post mortem tests. In 2015 it was documented that there had been an increased number of stillbirths. This could not have anything to do with Letby and it suggests other causes for the overall increased mortality in the paediatric unit of the hospital. It is interesting that new UVC (umbilical venous catheter) guidance was issued after the review, suggesting that mistakes had been made in using these catheters.The report findings demonstrated that the service provision was not compliant with current professional standards on staffing levels (both medical and nursing), nor on environment, and there was not enough support from the community neonatal team. There was also no adequate postnatal follow up. It identified that there were not enough consultants present at times of peak activity. The single consultant that had been available was simply inadequate. They identified that two scheduled consultant ward rounds per week was not sufficient for a neonatal unit and did not meet with their own requirements or that of the British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM). They made it clear that the appointment of two further consultants (with neonatal and diabetes interests) was necessary before any consideration could be given to the unit being returned to a level 2 LNU status. They identified that neither staffing numbers, nor the competency of those staff was appropriate for the acuity of the infants cared for. They state in the report:
‘The investigation reports from the infant deaths showed a pattern of insufficient senior cover and a reluctance to seek advice ……. Given the acuity of the unit (pre 7th July) there should have been a greater level of consultant presence on the ward.’
They identified that slots were frequently covered by locums who varied in capability. It was identified that regarding one of the deaths/collapses the nurses had expressed concern about the capability of the locum registrar whose agency had previously been advised not to offer that doctor to the Trust again. Nothing appeared to have been learned from this even though steps had been taken to make the consultant aware of the concerns.
They also noted that the CQC had indicated that the levels of neonatal nursing staff was not meeting professional standards and that they had required the Trust to ensure that this was rectified. It does not seem this was followed up and it seems nurses on the LNU were having to also administer antibiotics for another ward and also support the maternity unit. Clearly overworked and understaffed. In addition it was noted that the hospital was aware that on too many days intensive care was being provided in the LNU when it should really be provided in the higher level Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). It was also recognised that the locality had a high level of both domestic abuse and substance abuse.
Some nurses had stated that they felt disempowered to participate in escalation processes and decision making and that depending on which consultant or locum was on duty, they might feel less able to escalate (ie bother the doctor). The recent events had damaged trust between consultants and nursing staff. There were several reports also that doctors and consultants would wait too long before escalating concerns about an infant and also they would delay in informing transport teams when a transfer was needed.
The consultants had described to the RCPCH being ‘victims of their own success’. Quite what they mean by that is unclear, but given the appalling record of the neonateal unit in 2015/16 you would think they would be less self-aggrandizing. Tv doctor Ravi Jayaram makes an interesting psychological study. His frequent desire to appear on screen regarding this case is telling. It almost feels like he is doing a public form of admonishment for his own inner doubts regarding this whole witch-hunt. His emotional outbursts are reminiscent of Matt Hancock’s teary-eyed Oscar winning performance regarding some great aunt or someone or other he had lost to ‘covid’. I found his photo on ‘Shitchester files’. Not sure what he is doing there. Here he is on ITV News
Consultants could not really do their job if they were so emotionally invested in what is really the loss of others. Jayaram’s emotional outburst on the suggestion he is a hero during the above interview is telling. It looks like that is the last thing he believes as he chokes up, but then he wastes no time claiming he could well be a hero if the system improves due to his actions in the case. Given that he misled the jury in the trial by claiming that he had caught Lucy just as she had dislodged a breathing tube from one of the babies, when this was untrue, I hardly think hero is the right adjective to use. He based his reasoning on the fact that the baby was sedated at the time and could therefore not have accidentally moved the tube itself. But the defence showed that records proved that the baby was not sedated until after that event.
We are supposed to believe that the consultants had suspected they had a murderer called Lucy Letby on the unit but the RCPCH report noted that the Cheshire Child Death Overview Panel did not appear to have been alerted to the cluster of neonatal deaths. There should have been a Rapid Response Meeting within 5 working days of notification for some of the deaths. If the cause of death had been unclear, no death certificate should have been issued and the death would then have been referred immediately to the coroner. Dr. Brearey seems not to have made it clear to the nursing manager, Karen Rees, the seriousness of his concerns and she therefore had no reason to move Lucy off the unit. She however has left her job and seems to be being blamed somewhat for Lucy not being removed sooner. There seems to be a culture of blame of nursing staff and management by the consultant team and a complete inability to own their part in failures.
The RCPCH found several identifiable common factors/failings that could either partly or wholly explain the apparent increase in mortality 2015/16. These included medical and nursing staffing levels being inadequate and a lack of compliance with standards expected by the BAPM. Escalation of concerns to tertiary units for advice or transport was delayed and the threshold for activating such concerns was too high. It was also noted that when deaths occurred, cause of death was unclear as post mortems when they had been done, had not included systematic tests for toxicology, blood electrolytes or blood sugars.
None of these faults seems to involve Lucy Letby. You would think having a suspected evil serial killer on the ward would have perhaps been a factor identified by the RCPCH in explaining the mortality spike, but it was not. The evil serial killer was a factor which only existed in the heads of two consultants. Consultants who had legitimate reasons to worry that they might be accused of negligence regarding any one or all of these deaths.
Dr. Dewi Evans, the so called ‘independent expert’ during the hearing has put out a video on Sky News since, claiming that he read the RCPCH report and claiming that all it found was:
‘… nothing apart from …you know .. the need for a few more nurses … which is fine ….’
This is an outrageously false claim by the guy on whose report the prosecution relied almost solely to imprison Letby for life. This alone should surely be enough to warrant a retrial since it demonstrates that the conviction is unsafe. Here is the video on Sky news.
Even if we accepted the unlikely narrative that these babies were murdered, there is no direct evidence that Letby was the so-called psycho who did it. No one saw her do it, no witness, no CCTV, no motive. But the media and the baying mob who hang on its every word, wish us to believe that Lucy Letby is the biggest monster this country has ever bred, and her face should be plastered on the wall of fame alongside those other notorious female serial killers Myra Hindley and Rose West and fellow nurse Beverly Allit. They do not want you to notice the obvious glaring and endless amount of reasonable doubt in this case. Witch hunts need witches.
It could be that Regina Duggan has some involvement in this. She has been strategic in a project for the military which is attempting to produce a plane/drone which can fly forward, backwards , upwards downwards like a - you guessed it … hummingbird. They have a prototype. A lot can be found about her on the Unlimited Hangout page from Whitney Webb. As the former director of the Pentagon’s DARPA, Regina has her hands in every pie you can think of in silicon valley and elsewhere including the invasions of Iraq, Afghanistan and the funding for MRNA vaccine tech. During the scamdemic she was brought in to lead a global ‘health’ equivalent of DARPA for the Wellcome Trust called ‘Wellcome Leap’. In other words, Welcome to Brain Mapping, Transhumanism etc. Wellcome Trust has a fine history of eugenics which it appeared to support again in the covid operation. Regina thinks humans should be lab animals so was finding a way to promote that idea so that people would be willing to be experimented on without payment. Covid 19 provided the ideal opportunity to kick this off. It is debatable whether Regina is partly synthetic herself, she certainly does not seem to age in photos and does not seem to have existed as a child, just appeared on the scene in her current form and then frozen in time for twenty five odd years.
There is something else though. The lack of real evidence against Letby is so blindingly obvious that it cannot help but shine a light on a jury that is willing to find a person guilty on such tenuous grounds. I would not be surprised if very soon we start hearing loud calls for jury trials to be dispensed with. Bearing in mind the cabal’s tendency to throw ‘problem, reaction, solution’ out of the pram to get its needs met, it could well be that this case has been arranged to be the precursor to the death of juries. This would be the end of any hope of justice (or what is left of it) in our legal system and the last remnants of the Magna Carta and our right to be tried by our peers would finally be consigned to the scrapbook of history along with any remaining pretence at democracy. All inconvenient people will be taken off the streets and we will be happy.
Going back to the Aztec God (hummingbird) Huitzilopochtli, I am not sure whether the babies at Countess of Chester Hospital are supposed to be the sacrifice or Lucy herself, or both. If it was the babies we have to wonder who had a hand in that? It is pretty obvious that child sacrifice is a favourite hobby of the cult. Uvalde school massacre last year was peppered with Mayan sacrificial symbolism. However NHS nurses have been labelled angels by the media for many years. Lucy could be a symbol for the fallen angel. The fallen angel is Lucifer (light). If light is imprisoned, we are in trouble. Either way I am convinced this case was no accident.
There is presently a campaign to begin an appeal to attempt to overturn Lucy Letby's conviction. Only time will tell whether this case turns out to be the biggest miscarriage of justice that this country has ever seen.
For further info please see the following Richard Gill website :
https://gill1109.com/
and
Awesome, this article should be front page news on every British news site.
Briiant research and analysis, Cally.
I thought this was likely a miscarriage when I caught an interview with Lucy Letby's friend on the news. Intuition based on the friend's clear headed certainty and what I saw as a very unlikely scenario.